Cases 31 - 40 of 3,951
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
William Howard Blair and Darrell Eugene Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02081
Petitioner:
Ritchie Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clayton v. Henderson Investors, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Chris Clayton
Defendant:
Henderson Investors, LLC and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer and Unknown Pert Team Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
