Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wilmer Jerome Knight v. A. Cutchen
as 17-7008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILMER JEROME KNIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
A. CUTCHENS, Officer/Sergeant, MR. MAC-VEAN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and MR. HORTON, Institutional Investigator Lieutenant
Wilmer Knight v. Officer Sheppherd
as 15-6951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILMER JEROME KNIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER SHEPPHERD and OFFICER PARKS
Knight v. Clarke
as 3:2014cv00524
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Carter et al
as 3:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Defendant:
Donnie Carter, City of Richmond Police Dept. Detectives, C. T. Woody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Wilkinson et al
as 3:2012cv00727
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
James B. Wilkinson, James C. Wilker, Tracey E. Paner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Wilkinson et al
as 7:2012cv00463
Respondent:
Mr. Brown, Mr. Donnie Carter, Ms. Tracey E. Paner and others
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Kiser et al
as 7:2012cv00342
Defendant:
Mr. Gilbert, Ms. Kegley, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Vanover et al
as 7:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Defendant:
Mr. Bob Mullins and Mr. Vanover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00648
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly, J. Woodson, Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Kelly et al
as 3:2010cv00591
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly, J. Woodson and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
