Cases 1 - 10 of 24
O'HARA v. WINSLOW TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv14626
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, WINSLOW TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW GIBBONS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES O'HARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PFOST-ESPOSITO et al v. CAMDEN COUNTYet al
as 1:2018cv00677
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) 25-75, CAMDEN COUNTY, JOHN DOE(S) 1-24 and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY PFOST-ESPOSITO, DONALD PFOST and JUSTIN PFOST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WURTZBACHER v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
BERNARD WURTZBACHER
Defendant:
WINSLOW TOWNSHIP, ROBERT STIMELSKI, ROBERT GAUNTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACOBS v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2016cv05376
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACOBS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD , LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT , RONALD D. BURROWS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANGFORD v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LANGFORD
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, PAUL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
REED v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. REED, IV.
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER "JOHN DOE, WINSLOW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. BENDING et al
as 1:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN WALKER
Defendant:
BENDING, SANDERS, MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TICE v. WINSLOW TOWNSHIP POLICE et al
as 1:2013cv06894
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TICE
Defendant:
WINSLOW TOWNSHIP POLICE and MICHAEL GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
