Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pawochawog-Mequinosh v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Wolf Pawochawog-Mequinosh and Brian Keith Brownell
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury, William . Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00216
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00215
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Wolf et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 1:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
William Wolf and Sherri Gorodetsky Wolf
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
