Cases 1 - 10 of 759
Murkerson v. Teare et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Defendant:
Leonard C. Wood, Christopher James Teare, Lenn Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Murkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2024cv03192
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Robert Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Luo et al v. Patteron et al
as 3:2024cv00128
Defendant:
Richard Woods, Jack Overman, Brian Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie A., Jennifer A., Mary A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03909
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Devona Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shiloh Woods Townhome Association Inc v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv03975
Plaintiff:
Shiloh Woods Townhome Association Inc
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Woods v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv03112
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Fabian D. Woods, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Jester
as 1:2024cv03829
Respondent:
Warden T Jester
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Jester
as 1:2024cv03735
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods
Respondent:
T. Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Moss
as 1:2024cv02715
Respondent:
Dexter Moss
Petitioner:
Fabian D. Woods, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv02831
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Mark Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
