Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Foley v. Juan Valdes, et al
as 20-15178
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN CARLOS VALDES, AP EXPRESS WORLDWIDE, LLC, WORLD PACK USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL FOLEY
Dapena v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv04487
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation and World Pack USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lisette Dapena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foley v. Valdes et al
as 2:2017cv02783
Defendant:
AP Express Worldwide, LLC, AP Express, LLC, Patricia Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00091
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation and World Pack USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Yeti Coolers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01283
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation and World Pack USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Yeti Coolers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
EVERBRITE, LLC v. ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04180
Plaintiff:
EVERBRITE, LLC
Defendant:
ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, WORLD PACK USA, LLC and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Thinoptics, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01952
Plaintiff:
Thinoptics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation, World Pack USA, LLC, Telebrands Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gordon et al v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Callendar and Marc C Gordon
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation and World Pack USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
