Cases 1 - 10 of 39
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
RODRIGUEZ v. KATTNER et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
ADORIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
RYAN KATTNER, CONSTANCE WU and BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Woodstream Corporation v. Wu
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Woodstream Corporation
Defendant:
Wang Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WU v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv03131
Plaintiff:
JIN WONG WU and JIN HONG WU
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, LA CHAPANITA GROCERY STORE II, INC., EVELIO FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
WU v. VAL PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
LISHA WU
Defendant:
VAL PARTNERS, INC. doing business as JUST ENUFF LOUNGE, JUST ENUFF JACK, LLC, 565 LANDIS, LLC doing business as JUST ENUFF CABARET and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wu v. M.A.G. ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.
as 2:2022cv03069
Plaintiff:
Lisha Wu
Defendant:
M.A.G. ENTERPRISES, INC., M.A.G. ENTERPRISES, INC. a Pennsylvania Corporation doing business as THE OASIS GENTLEMEN'S CLUB, JOHN A. MEEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Wu v. 3 Bulls USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
En Guang Wu
Defendant:
3 Bulls USA, Inc. and Jue Ning Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Zhou v. USA
as 1:2021cv00675
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Xiao Wu Zhou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wu v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05584
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Susan Wu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
