Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cheryl James, et al v. City of Wilkes Barre, et al
as 15-3269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHERYL JAMES, WARREN JAMES and NICOLE JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WILKES BARRE, WRIGHT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILKES BARRE HOSPITAL CO LLC, d/b/a WILKES-BARRE GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
AMY LYNN CRAIG, BRIAN THOMAS MORAN, BETH ANN NOBLE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLIE CASEY
Cheryl James, et al v. Wilkes Barre City, et al
as 11-3345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHERYL JAMES and NICOLE JAMES
Petitioner - Appellee:
WARREN JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
WILKES BARRE CITY, WRIGHT TOWNSHIP, WILKES BARRE HOSP CO, DBA Wilkes-Barre Gen and others
Debtor - Appellee:
BRIAN THOMAS MORAN
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MARSHALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Terence Kimberg v. Univ Scranton, et al
as 09-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERENCE KIMBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIV SCRANTON, WYOMING VALLEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC. and CAROLINE RASKIEWICZ, Individually and as Program Director for the University of Scranton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
