Cases 11 - 20 of 21
LOWREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BLAKE LOWREY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA, SAMUEL D OZBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Anthony of Lowery Family et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv03175
Plaintiff:
Anthony of Lowrey Family and Anthony Blake Lowrey Estate Trust
Defendant:
United States of America, Walton County, Samuel D. Ozburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MCQURTER v. Chapman et al
as 3:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HENRY MCQURTER, JR
Defendant:
Joe Chapman, Wade Harris and Deborah Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prison Legal News, et al v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News and HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Defendant:
Joe Chapman and Wade Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCQURTER v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HENREY MCQURTER, JR
Defendant:
Joe Chapman, Wade Harris and Deborah Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAVER v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
TRENTON LEE BEAVER
Defendant:
Joe Chapman, Wade Harris and Deborah Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTEE v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
BARRY MARQUEZ PARTEE
Defendant:
Joe Chapman, Wade Harris and Deborah Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JEFFERY ANDERSON
Defendant:
Joe Chapman, Wade Harris and Deborah Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MORRISON et al
as 3:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
QWANTANA SMITH
Defendant:
MORRISON, DOWIS and Wade Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus v. Walton County Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant:
Walton County Detention Center and Wade Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
