Cases 31 - 40 of 53
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, individually and in her official capacity as governor, and predecessor Mike Easley, individually and official capacity as governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in his official capacity as county manager of Wake County, North Carolina and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Danielle Doyle
as 15-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a minor child
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIELLE DOYLE, Child Protective Services, Social Worker of Wake County Human Services, of Cary North Carolina in her individual and official capacities, RAMON RAJANO, Director, Wake County Human Services of Raleigh, North Carolina in his individual and official capacities, DAVID COOKE, Manager, Wake County Government of Raleigh, North Carolina in his individual and official capacities and others
William Davis, II v. Department of State
as 15-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Department of State
as 14-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Department of State
as 14-1916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 14-1495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Department of State
as 13-2523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT and others
Loushonda Myers v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
Loushonda Myers v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-1963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
William Davis, II v. State of North Carolina
as 13-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, and a "Minor J.F.D" as next best friend
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, "Pat McCory" individually and as Governor, WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, "Ramon Rojano" individually and as Director and WAKE COUNTY N.C., FAMILY COURT, "Donald Steven" Chief Superior Court Judge 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina individually and in his official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
