Cases 21 - 30 of 389
CREECY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
THERESA CREECY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HARRIS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
TINA HARRIS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MAY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
TERRY MAY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HURST v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
JACOB HURST
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HYDE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
NANCY HYDE
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., WAL-MART STORES INC., EAST, LP, WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, #5804 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
COMPARET v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
AMBER COMPARET
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GILL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
DANNY GILL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BREWER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
MARGIE BREWER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
