Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gentry v. Wal Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Trenisha Gentry
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dover v. Wal-Mart North, Jackson TN
as 1:2019cv01087
Defendant:
Wal-Mart North, Jackson TN
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shores v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2014cv02326
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Shores
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Henderson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Virgil L. Henderson , Devonte Coleman and Kenwin Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brewer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et. al.
as 4:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Thomas N Brewer
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Follis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00705
Plaintiff:
Teresa D. Follis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Anderson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2012cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Anderson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Miscellaneou:
Edward L. Stanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roberts et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Roberts and Rethia Marie Roberts
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 2:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Gary V Cook
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Camacho v. USA et al
as 2:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
Kathy Camacho
Defendant:
USA, State Of Mississippi, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
