Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Murphy v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Artis W Murphy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. et al
as 2:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Peggy Wells
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Fultondale, Alabama, City of et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00848
Plaintiff:
Centre, Alabama, City of, Attalla, Alabama, City Of, Graysville, Alabama, City of and others
Defendant:
Thomas Mason Dunn, Steven Bruce Hefter, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gulledge v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 2:2018cv00563
Plaintiff:
Patricia K Gulledge
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Welch v. Wal Mart Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Gloria Welch
Defendant:
Wal Mart Inc and Fairfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Marlowe v. Roesner et al
as 5:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Marlowe
Defendant:
Donald Roesner, Mark Clifton and Wal Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Weldon v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Weldon, Samuel C. Weldon and Samuel C. Weldon
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle, Inc., Dorel Industries, Inc. and Wal Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
