Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Walgreen Co. v. Haseotes et al
as 1:2024cv10151
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Aristedes Haseotes and Byron Haseotes
Walgreen Co. v. Haseotes et al
as 4:2024cv10151
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreens
Defendant:
Aristedes Haseotes and Byron Haseotes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walgreen CO et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2023cv13061
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO, The Kroger Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Abernathy v. Combe Incorporated, et al
as 21-2013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN B. ABERNATHY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMBE INCORPORATED, COMBE MANUFACTURING, INC., COMBE LABRATORIES, INC. and others
Town of Andover v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc et al
as 1:2019cv12117
Defendant:
SpecGX, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Andover
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
Ayad v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2019cv11309
Plaintiff:
Zagloul E. Ayad
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Somerville v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv11009
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Somerville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
