Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kalamazoo, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
Kalamazoo County, Michigan and Kalamazoo, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00438
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, Purdue Pharma L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN and Calhoun, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Muskegon, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Muskegon, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Branch, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Branch County, Michigan and Branch, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Van Horn v. Walgreen's Co.
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Donna Van Horn
Defendant:
Walgreen's Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lippins v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Leone E. Lippins
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoven v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2011cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Hoven
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michigan, State of v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
