Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Overton v. Micelli et al
as 4:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Michael Micelli and Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
D.M.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVIDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Iredell County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00090
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PINKLETON v. WALGREEN CO., et al.
as 1:2015cv00560
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO. and CFP WAL-GREENSBORO, LLC
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE PINKLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Walgreen Co.
as 7:2014cv00179
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buyer's Direct Inc. v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2013cv00819
Plaintiff:
Buyer's Direct Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Howell v. Walgreen Co.
as 7:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Howell
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
