Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Windell Blount, et al v. Mississippi Dept of Human Svc, et al
as 17-60229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINDELL C. BLOUNT and JAMES M. EVANS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, RICHARD BERRY, Executive Director, LINDA SLAUGHTER, Regional Director and others
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Redd et al v. Westbrook et al
as 3:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Billy Redd , Nathaniel Martin Buchanan , Steve Leslie and others
Defendant:
Lee Westbrook, Madison County Board of Supervisors and Madison County Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chayer v. Barbour et al
as 3:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chayer, Stephen Chayer, Stephen Chayer and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Donald Taylor, Walley Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.