Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODHOUSE et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
AMY WOODHOUSE , RICHARD TOBEY SCOTT , WILLIAM HASTINGS and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES , MATTHEW DUNLAP and WALTER F MCKEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTER et al v. ROYAL CARRIBEAN CRUISES LTD et al
as 2:2013cv00445
Plaintiff:
DEANN WALTER and RAY WALTER
Defendant:
INTERCRUISES SHORESIDE & PORTS SERVICES INC and ISHERWOOD ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. ESTATE OF WALTER A. VETTER
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ESTATE OF WALTER A. VETTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WALTERS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M WALTERS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NICHOLAS et al v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES INC
as 2:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
WALTER D NICHOLAS and DEBORAH A NICHOLAS
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al
as 1:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Defendant:
RICHARD LAHAYE, JR, JESSICA DANIELSON, MICHAEL LARRIVEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURGIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
WALTER G DURGIN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WING v. PIKE et al
as 1:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WING
Defendant:
DENNIS PIKE , FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL , DOUGLAS BLOUVELT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
