Cases
Damon Wood v. TDCJ - Rehabilitation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-40532
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAMON LEE WOOD
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE REHABILITATION & RE-ENTRY PROGRAM, MADELINE M. ORTIZ, Director - Rehab Programs Division, JOSEPH A. BON-JORNO, Sex Offender Rehab Programs Manager and others
Wood v. TDCJ-CID Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00182
Plaintiff: Damon Lee Wood
Defendant: TDCJ-CID Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program Division, Madeline Ortiz, Joseph A. Bon-Jorno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program
as 9:2010cv00022
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program, Madeline M. Ortiz, Joseph A. Bon-Jorno and others
Plaintiff: Damon Lee Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Mosley, et al
as 08-40990
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHALE T JACKSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: CLARENCE MOSLEY, JR., Warden, L V Hightower Unit, WALTER B CONNEALY, Program Speacialist IV, ENOBONG J INYANG, Asosciate Psychologist IV and others
Jackson v. Mosley et al
as 1:2007cv00365
Plaintiff: Michale T Jackson, Sr
Defendant: Clarence Mosley, Jr, Walter B Connealy and Enobong J Inyang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mosley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00364
Plaintiff: Michale T Jackson, Sr
Defendant: Clarence Mosley, Jr, Walter B Connealy and Enobong J Inyang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mosley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00366
Plaintiff: Michale T Jackson, Sr
Defendant: Clarence Mosley, Jr, Walter B Connealy and Enobong J Inyang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?