Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Thomas v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Camilla Cargill, L. Thompkins, K. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Clistopher L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Crow
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Walter Myers and State Of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Warden John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodgers v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Captain Dansby, Officer Lampkin, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bradford et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01091
Defendant:
Officer Lampkin, Captain Dansby, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Walter Myers and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dakins v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2019cv00664
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Alabama Department of Corrections and Walter Myers
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Dakins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Downes v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00469
Defendant:
P. A. Driggers, Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Downes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Officer Simmons, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Dionntez Byner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00412
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Board of Pardons and Paroles, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Isaac et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Montavious K. Askew
Defendant:
Timothy Isaac, Kelvin Key, Captain Danzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
