Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Simon Jr v. Roddy et al
as 3:2026cv02843
Defendant:
Michael M. Roddy, Michelle Bain, Stephanie Dooley and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Walter Simon and Phillip W. Simon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Phillip Simon v. SSA, et al
as 25-5397
Plaintiff:
Phillip Walter Simon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Brent Murphy
SIMON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2025cv03452
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WALTER SIMON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon v. Washington, et al.
as 25-2163
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WALTER SIMON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. WASHINGTON, ALEXANDRIA R. MCINTOSH, DANIEL J. MARTIN and others
Simon v. Bostick, et al.
as 25-2164
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WALTER SIMON
Defendant:
LYNNETTA M. WATTS, NORA L. WATTS, WILLIAM Y. WOODS and others
Simon v. Washington, et al.
as 25-2159
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WALTER SIMON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. WASHINGTON, ALEXANDRIA R. MCINTOSH, DANIEL J. MARTIN and others
Simon v. Cumba
as 3:2025cv00107
Defendant:
Deborah A. Cumba
Plaintiff:
Phillip Walter Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Simon v. Washington et al
as 3:2025cv00109
Defendant:
Michael D. Washington, Alexandria R. McIntosh, Daniel J. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Walter Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
USA et al v. Pierluisi-Isern et al
as 3:2024cv01334
Defendant:
Bosque Verde LLC, Patricia de los Angeles Pierluisi Gonzalez-Coya, Fideicomiso WMP (WMP Trust Fund) and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
