Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
T.W. et al v. Southern Columbia Area School District
as 4:2020cv01688
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waltman, T.W. and Karen Wojtowicz
Defendant:
Southern Columbia Area School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOWNSEND v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv01023
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER and OFFICER BRADLEY WALTMAN
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagerty v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01973
Defendant:
Dr. Xie, CO's Jane/John Does, Superintendent Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hagerty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Waltman et al
as 4:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Stone and Deborah L. Stone
Defendant:
Shawn Waltman , James Wool , Correct Care Solutions, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Waltman
as 3:2016cv01375
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gonzalez , Severin Johnson and Michael Scott Marshall
Defendant:
William Waltman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. WALTMAN et al
as 2:2015cv06291
Plaintiff:
JALISA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
RYAN WALTMAN , JASON TOMON and JUANEKA HARLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. PALMA et al
as 2:2014cv03978
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. PALMA, JR., RYAN WALTMAN, LEONARD AZZARANO LEONAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
