Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rosario et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 9:2021cv80352
Defendant:
VI-JON, LLC, Publix Super Markets, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Ramos Rosario and Wanda Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv12398
Plaintiff:
Yaadmarie Silva, Catherine Jirak Monetti, Brianna Seminerio and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Knight et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12399
Plaintiff:
Yaadmarie Silva, Catherine Jirak Monetti, Brianna Seminerio and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabi and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Perez-Cortes et al
as 3:2018cv01723
Defendant:
Joshua Nathaniel Bas Pedregueira, Daniel Bas Pedregueira, Jose Rafael Bas Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, D/B/A Christiana Trust, As Indenture Trustee, for the CSMC 2016-PR1 Trust, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2016-PR1 and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrell v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02354
Defendant:
A Medium Corporation, Manuel Gomez, Law Cash, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arroyo v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv09953
Plaintiff:
Santia Arroyo
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Michael A. Vega and Wanda Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perez v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv07322
Plaintiff:
Wanda Perez
Defendant:
The United States of America, The U.S. Postal Service and Providencia Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Refund of penalty imposed by I.R.S.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
