Cases 1 - 10 of 4,715
Terry et al v. Foreman et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry and Unamed Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
M. Foreman, Annette Chambers-Smith, N. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00692
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Dale
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Mota v. Bobby et al.
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Warden David Bobby, Cousel Master, Counsel Haad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Joshua Benedict
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Warden, FCI Loretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larr v. Mackey
as 2:2024cv01730
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
