Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Berrios-Osorto v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Olvyn Abilo Berrios-Osorto
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Avila v. Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00270
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
James Anthony Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez v. Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00269
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Leif Diaz Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Casey Michael Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Powell v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 24-40240
Petitioner:
Jacob Alan Powell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Maxwell v. Thomas
as 23-40699
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Maxwell
Respondent / Appellee:
Albert Thomas, III, Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Hernandez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00432
Petitioner:
Antonio Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
