Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Lambert v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01100
Petitioner: Mario Lambert
Respondent: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Belton v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01370
Petitioner: Emanucel Belton
Respondent: USA and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff: Nekia Turner
Defendant: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02807
Petitioner: Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent: United States of America and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Licata v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01321
Petitioner: Joseph Licata
Respondent: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01285
Petitioner: Nekia Turner
Respondent: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fenderson v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01146
Petitioner: Tereze L Fenderson
Respondent: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph Whipps v. K. Bennett
as 23-1289
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH JOHN WHIPPS
Respondent / Appellee: K. BENNETT, Warden, FCI Pekin
Gordon v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01469
Petitioner: Alxleotold Gordon
Respondent: Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whipps v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01456
Petitioner: Joseph John Whipps
Respondent: Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?