Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Tyler v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2016cv01671
Petitioner: Kevin Veshon Tyler
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alan Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10534
Petitioner - Appellant: ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
Smith v. Warden, USP- Atlanta
as 1:2016cv01230
Petitioner: Curtis Lee Smith
Respondent: Warden, USP- Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kent v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2015cv02871
Petitioner: Timothy Dewayne Kent
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cartman v. Warden USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv02126
Plaintiff: Anthony-Vincent Cartman
Defendant: Warden USP Atlanta and U. S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Webb v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2015cv01690
Petitioner: Tyrone Egbert Webb
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graves v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2014cv03830
Petitioner: Gary Graves
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03481
Petitioner: Miles Frederick
Respondent: Warden USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ahern v. Warden, USP Atlanta We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03290
Petitioner: Sean Ahern
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcus Watkins v. Warden, et al
as 14-13544
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN, N. BARFIELD, Counselor, USP Atlanta, federal defendant, Q. M. FORBES, Unit Manager, USP Atlanta, federal defendant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?