Cases 1 - 10 of 2,634
Martinez v. Warden, FCI- Edgefield
as 2:2024cv05257
Petitioner:
Eduardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI- Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv05142
Petitioner:
Pedro Lazaro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. Bailey
as 5:2024cv05117
Respondent:
Warden Bailey
Petitioner:
Lance Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. FCI Pollock
as 1:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Muzammil Ali
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tyler v. Coe et al
as 9:2024cv05075
Defendant:
James Hudson, Warden Coe and Alllison Days
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey v. F.C.I. Edgefield
as 0:2024cv04161
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
Petitioner:
Tyrone Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henry v. Palmer et al
as 4:2024cv04096
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer and Associate Warden Stanly Terry
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Oxendine v. Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03995
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Oxendine
Respondent:
Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Millner v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv04025
Petitioner:
Clyde Millner
Respondent:
Warden of Bennettsville Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Monroe v. Napier
as 5:2024cv04862
Respondent:
Warden Napier
Petitioner:
Cedric Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
