Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Beckett v. Warden, Byrd Unit
as 4:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Warden Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckett v. Warden, Byrd Unit
as 1:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Respondent:
Warden, Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prescott v. Doe
as 21-20151
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, John Doe, Food Service Manager, Byrd Unit, Steven Miller, Warden, Byrd Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Hamby v. Warden, Byrd Unit
as 4:2020cv02780
Plaintiff:
Jackie Hamby
Defendant:
Warden Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Gonzales v. TDCJ, et al
as 20-20369
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNSTVILLE UNIT, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WARDEN, at the Huntsville Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS GONZALES
Hamby v. Warden, Hightower Unit et al
as 1:2020cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jackie Hamby
Defendant:
Warden, Estelle Unit, Warden, Byrd Unit and Warden, Hightower Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn Monroe v. John Doe, et al
as 16-20503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAUGHN MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, I - Director - University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas, DR. L. LINTHICUM, Medical Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas and others
Richard Strasser v. Shawn Bennett, et al
as 12-10218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BRIAN STRASSER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN BENNETT, Sergeant, French M. Robertson Unit, DAVID LOFTON, Major, French M. Robertson Unit, RICHARD AVANTS, Captain, French M. Robertson Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
