Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stokes v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv03169
Plaintiff:
Derrick Stokes
Defendant:
Warden Donald Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piccaluga v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Piccaluga
Defendant:
Warden Donald Jackson, East Mississippi Correctional Facility and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickerson v. King
as 23-60535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Ron King and Warden Donald Jackson
Marshall v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Randy Carl Marshall
Defendant:
Warden Donald Jackson, Sgt. Unknown Smith, Management Training Corporation (MTC) and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Marshall Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Donald Jackson, Deputy Warden Jacobo Vigilante and Captain Unknown Scott
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Scott Tyner
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Warden Donald Jackson and Scott Marquardt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Commissioner Burl Cain, Director Ron King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisholm v. Banford et al
as 3:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Tony Chisholm
Defendant:
Ellen Rebbecca Banford, County Governmet Officials, Board of Administrators and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
