Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Najarred Walker v. Frank Bishop
as 23-7138
Petitioner / Appellant:
NAJARRED T. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tommy Robinson v. Michael Thomas
as 21-7199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY RAY ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL P. THOMAS, Security Chief, LT. JEFFREY L. MCFARLAND, CO II JOSEPH M. MCKENZIE and others
Jerome McBride v. J. Most
as 21-6302
Defendant / Appellee:
W. MULLER, SGT. JANET M. PUFFENBERGER, DAYENA CORCORAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME MCBRIDE
McBride v. Most et al
as 8:2020cv03002
Defendant:
Wilser, Mr. Wayne Hill, C. Gilpin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv02531
Defendant:
Kristofer Davis, Commissioner Wayne Hill, Lander Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Benjamin Vance v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 20-6970
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN E. VANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.
Walker v. Bishop et al
as 8:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Warden Frank B Bishop and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Najarred T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice Stewart, Jr. v. Maryland Division of Corr.
as 19-6958
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRADLEY WILT, MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BEACHY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE BERNARD STEWART, JR.
Dixon v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv01957
Plaintiff:
William K. Dixon
Defendant:
Warden Frank B. Bishop and Co II G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Appleby-El v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 8:2019cv01868
Defendant:
RNP Krista Bilak, SELF, Mahboob Ashraf and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel B. Appleby-El
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 1202
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
