Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Glover v. Roman et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dayquon Glover
Defendant:
Roman, Davis, Warden Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mr. Beau Maestas
Defendant:
Warden Gittere, William Reubart and J Verde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciolino v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephen F.P. Ciolino
Defendant:
State of Nevada Ex Rel, NDOC Warden Gittere, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony Earley
Defendant:
NDOC, Warden Gittere, Acting Warden Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKendrick v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Sean McKendrick
Defendant:
Warden Gittere and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ackerman v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
NDOC Warden Gittere, NDOC Director, B. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iden v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
Caseworker Hernandez, Warden Gittere, Dugan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrum v. Ford et al
as 2:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
A.G. Aaron Ford, William Daniels, William Warden Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Respondent:
NDOC Warden Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniels v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00692
Respondent:
Warden Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
