Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett v. Warden John Wolfe
as 18-6226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE, LIBRARIAN JUNE BRITTINGHAM, L.T. VANESSA JONES and others
Chauncey Bennett v. John Wolfe
as 17-7168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE, LIEUTENANT RUBY WHITE, LIEUTENANT VALERIE STYLES and others
Gregory Marshall v. Ava Joubert
as 15-7334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. AVA JOUBERT, DR. COLIN OTTEY, DR. BOLAJI ONABAJO and others
Defendant:
LT. BRANDON BARNETT, CAPTAIN SHAW, WARDEN JOHN WOLF and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atah El v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00948
Petitioner:
Sakitah Selmah Atah El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice El v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00763
Petitioner:
Lamont Maurice El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory Marshall v. Ava Joubert
as 15-6335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. AVA JOUBERT, DR. COLIN OTTEY, DR. RIZVI SYED and others
Defendant:
LT. BRANDON BARNETT, CAPT. SHAW, WARDEN JOHN WOLF and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Frederick Moore v. Warden John Wolfe
as 14-6270
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK JAMES MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
