Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Murillo v. Covello et al
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sandoval v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Richard Sandoval
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dela Calzada v. Patrick Covello
as 3:2023cv06465
Petitioner:
Jovencio Dela Calzada
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Rico Doyle
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Cooper and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Archuleta v. Covello
as 3:2023cv05222
Petitioner:
David Clair Archuleta
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merced v. Covello
as 3:2023cv04763
Petitioner:
Juan Autilano Merced, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khaliqi v. Covello
as 4:2023cv04359
Petitioner:
Mohammad Khaliqi
Respondent:
Acting Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Culver et al
as 4:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Roderick A. Brooks
Defendant:
Daniel Culver, Major Garrett Simmons, Donna Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
