Cases 1 - 10 of 27
DeFour v. Mailroom Supervisor JB et al
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor JB, Warden Rick White and Major J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Micah Smith
Defendant:
Director Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Major Jeremy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. White
as 3:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. White
as 2:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rick White and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Riddick v. Begley et al
as 7:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. R. Begley, Unit Manager Stacey Day and Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Destined George
Defendant:
Sgt. Smith, C.O. Robbins, C.O. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
