Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aurel v. Alston et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Lt. Alston, India White, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. ViaPath Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
ViaPath Technologies, Olan Owolabi, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Selvin v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Romero Leon Selvin
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean, Yes Care, Inc., Nicole Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Robert et al
as 1:2023cv02964
Plaintiff:
Bryant E Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean, Lieutenant Olan Owolabi, Captain Brandon Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Exum v. L.T. Donna et al
as 1:2023cv02888
Plaintiff:
Eric Exum and Eric Ricardo Exum
Defendant:
L.T. Donna, Sgt. Jordan, CO. 2 Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Dean et al.
as 1:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Terence A.W. Green, Jr.
Defendant:
The Warden Robert Dean, Correctional Officer Lt. Ukwu, Correctional Officer I. Ngu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Bey v. Frosh et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Warden Robert Dean and The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shabazz v. Dean
as 1:2022cv02570
Plaintiff:
Shakim Shabazz
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01893
Plaintiff:
Bernard Campbell
Defendant:
Warden, Dr. Temesgen, RMD, Corizon Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
