Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
Brown v. Spaulding
as 3:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Shawnta L. Brown
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bruce v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01972
Petitioner:
Charles Gary Bruce
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tahir v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
Shahid Tahir
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters et al
as 3:2020cv02433
Defendant:
Edinger, D. Fassero, A. Duttry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanter v. Spaulding
as 1:2020cv02163
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Petitioner:
Robert Lanter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Black et al
as 1:2020cv02011
Defendant:
Warden Spaulding, Captain Konkle, Unknown Name Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallon v. Spaulding
as 4:2020cv01964
Petitioner:
Michael Gallon
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunston v. Spaulding
as 4:2020cv01961
Petitioner:
Joseph Dunston
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Olson et al
as 3:2020cv01713
Defendant:
A. Duttry, Unknown Named Owners at Rueters Geisinger Eye Institute, Dr. Joanna Marie Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
