Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Grady v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
Richard Grady
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Langendorfer v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00556
Plaintiff:
James R Langendorfer
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Raymond Williams
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jereme Lee Woods
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Smith v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 09-31198
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, on behalf of State of Louisiana
Marlon Brooks v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 09-31082
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLON BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Zeigler v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 3:2009cv01623
Plaintiff:
Garry Zeigler, Sr
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2009cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jamar D Taylor
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
