Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Raymond Drumgoole v. US
as 23-6444
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND DRUMGOOLE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ALAN GOLDSTICKER, DA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Drumgoole v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
Raymond Drumgoole
Respondent:
United States of |America, Michael A. Goldsticker, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drumgoole v. Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Raymond Drumgoole
Defendant:
Homeland Security, United States of |America, Michael A. Goldsticker, DA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LeMay v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Kareem LeMay
Defendant:
United States of America, Micheal Maffei, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeMay v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Kareem LeMay
Defendant:
United States of America, Micheal Maffei, Derrick Acker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Brandon Daniels
Defendant:
United States of America, Jonathan Siegal, DA, Michael W. Gibaldi, DA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drumgoole v. Homeland Security et al
as 1:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
Raymond Drumgoole
Defendant:
Homeland Security, United States of America, Michael A. Goldsticker, DA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drumgoole v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Petitioner:
Raymond Drumgoole
Respondent:
United States of America, Michael A. Goldsticker, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
