Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden Warden, Marion Correctional Institution and Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunkle v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00520
Petitioner:
David Dunkle
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kayie Wright v. Christopher Rich
as 20-7428
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY SWINK, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, LONG, [Captain] of S.R.G., in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, JULIA JENKINS, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT, a/k/a Kayie Shaune Wright
Sell Jefferson v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 17-3791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SELL JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, Director of Ohio Department of Corrections, ANDRE IMBROGNO, Chairman, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, JASON BUNTING, Warden, Warden, Marion Correctional Institution and others
Timothy Jones v. Jason Bunting
as 14-4012
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALLEN JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
JASON BUNTING, Warden, Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Jacobs v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2013cv01306
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cubic v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv01472
Petitioner:
Jason A. Cubic
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunkle v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2011cv01638
Petitioner:
David Dunkle
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
