Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Warfield v. Tibbet et al
as 2:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
Walt Tibbet, Donald A. duBain, Krishna A. Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PS) Warfield v. Hale
as 2:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
Melvin Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Warfield v. McNaughton Daily Republic Newspaper et al
as 2:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
McNaughton Daily Republic Newspaper and Jess Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PS) Warfield v. Solano County Public Defenders Offices et al
as 2:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
Solano County Public Defenders Offices, Solano County Fairfield, Public Defender Offices and Solano County Conflict Defender Offices
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
