Cases 41 - 50 of 277
Waseem Daker v. Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, et al
as 21-11068
Defendant / Appellee:
T. JACKSON BEDFORD, Judge, CHRISTOPHER M. BRASHER, KIMBERLY E. ADAMS, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Neil Warren, et al
as 21-11055
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET PRINCE, Cobb County Sheriff Office, JAY C. STEPHENSON, Clerk, NEIL WARREN, Sheriff, Cobb County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
DAKER v. LAIDLER et al
as 5:2021cv00087
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK CRYSTAL CARTER, CLERK JUANITA M LAIDLER and MACON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Michael Almand, et al
as 21-10618
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTORIA A. SCHUSTER, Court Reporter, DONNA HASINSKI, Court Reporter, MICHAEL W. ALMAND, Court Reporter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Victor Reynolds, et al
as 21-10614
Defendant / Appellee:
AMELIA G. PRAY, CHRISTINA WILLOUGHBY, VICTOR REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. American Equity Investment Ins, et al
as 20-3664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Waseem Daker
Defendant / Appellee:
American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and Maria Connett
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020mi00170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daker v. Adams
as 6:2020cv00115
Petitioner:
Waseem Daker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Warden Brian Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
