Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 23-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHAVA MOYE, officially as Interim Director of Alvin S. Glen Detention Center ("ASGDC") for injunctive relief and declaratory relief, and individually for damages, SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES OF ASGDC, who negligently and/or intentionally injured plaintiff, individually for damages, RICHLAND COUNTY, ("RC"), SC, for damages and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 23-1503
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALEXANDER MURDAUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHAVA MOYE, In her official capacity as Interim Director Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, Richland County Government
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 22-7343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD JOHN ZELENKA, officially as Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina ("SCAG") and as Chief of SCAG's office's Criminal Division, officially for declaratory and injunctive relief, and individually for damages, ALL OTHER UNKNOWN-NAMES PERSONS, who injured and/or conspired to injured Plaintiff, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and others
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Moye et al
as 3:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Washava Moye, specific employees of ASGDC and Richland County ("RC"), SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Moye
as 3:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Washava Moye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Murdaugh v. Moye
as 3:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander Murdaugh
Petitioner:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
D. Shane Kitchens and Washava Moye
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
