Cases 1 - 10 of 747
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion County)
as 5:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Calvin Washington
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Darryl Washington
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Doctor v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Armando Jermaal Doctor
Defendant:
Barnes, Brown, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Janson
as 1:2024cv01296
Petitioner:
George Washington Dunn
Respondent:
Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Gavin Washington Guy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. JONES et al
as 3:2023cv24756
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
G JONES, HERNANDEZ and SABRINA POTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
