Cases 1 - 10 of 56
J.T. MUGS INC. v. 531 WASHINGTON STREET LLC
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
J.T. MUGS INC.
Defendant:
531 WASHINGTON STREET LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Declaratory Judgment
WORSLEY v. THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF WASHINGTON DC
as 2:2023cv02995
Plaintiff:
LATISHA WORSLEY
Defendant:
THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF WASHINGTON DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co v. Keith Sequeira, et al
as 23-1324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH P. SEQUEIRA and HELEN D. SEQUEIRA
Not Classified By Court:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, I. MARK COHEN and others
WASHINGTON et al v. WELLS FARGO NA BANK et al
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO NA BANK
Defendant:
SONIA WASHINGTON, STEPHANIE WASHINGTON and ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Interested Party:
MARKO KOPIC, EUGENIO GENISE, STUART WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST 2017-4 et al v. WASHINGTON et al
as 3:2022cv06589
Defendant:
KRISTIN WASHINGTON, KRISTIN RAE WASHINGTON, MR. WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUS 2017-4, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CSAIL 2017-C8 COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2017-C8 v. FT. WASHINGTON HOSPITALITY PARTNERS, LLC
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
FT. WASHINGTON HOSPITALITY PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CSAIL 2017-C8 COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2017-C8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLERING v. STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2020cv06332
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
ROVER PIPELINE LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.130 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.63 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20 ACRES, MO et al
as 2:2019cv00701
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.130 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.63 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20 ACRES, MO, ANY UNKNOWN OWNERS and LARA CICCOLELLA
Plaintiff:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ROVER PIPELINE LLC v. ROVER TRACCT NO. PA-WA-HL-004.500 COPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.3600 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PAREL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TOTALING 49.571 ACRES et al
as 2:2019cv00292
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO.PA-WA-HL-012.20-ATWS COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 4.3600 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 125.462, ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-020.000 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 3.0376 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 120.041 AC, ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.140 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 0.0900 ACRES, ORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20.00 ACRES and others
Plaintiff:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
REYES v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al
as 2:2018cv02638
Plaintiff:
LOUISA L REYES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., FEDERAL HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
