Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Washington v. Harrelson et al
as 4:2009cv02745
Plaintiff:
David Washington
Defendant:
Louis Harrelson, Richard's Tire, Chief Kenny Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al
as 2:2008cv02281
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Pepsi Bottling Group, Lynn Holly, John T Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jenkins et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins, Christopher Jenkins, Othelle Rhue and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint, James Slaigh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Burns et al
as 4:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
David J Washington
Defendant:
Daryl L Burns, Diane Scott, Judge Bristow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Washington v. Elliot et al
as 4:2007cv00619
Plaintiff:
David J Washington
Defendant:
Pamela T Elliot, Levone Graves, Magistrate Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
