Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vigil v. Waste Connections, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02383
Defendant:
Waste Connections, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vigil and Lori Vigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julian Ramirez Abad v. Waste Connections, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06708
Plaintiff:
Julian Ramirez Abad
Defendant:
Does, Waste Connections Management Services, Inc., Waste Connections of California, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012at00407
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc. et al v. County of Solano
as 2:2009cv02514
Plaintiff:
Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc., Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc., BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, Inc. and others
Defendant:
County of Solano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Waste Connections, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00135
Defendant:
Waste Connections, Inc. and Waste Connections of California, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Heath Belcher and Denessa Arguello
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
California Shock Trauma v. State Compensation Insurance, et al
as 2:2009cv00090
Defendant:
Truck Insurance Exchange, City of Watsonville, FirstComp Underwriters Group and others
Amicus Curiae:
Med Trans Corporation, Air Methods Corporation, California Association of Air Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
California Shock Trauma Air Rescue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pierce, et al v. Mittelstaedt, et al
as 2:2007cv00207
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Pierce and John Bannister
Defendant:
Steven F. Bouck, Darrell W. Chambliss, Robert H. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
