Cases 1 - 10 of 919
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11126
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller, The City of Detroit and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miles v. Wayne County Treasurer et al
as 2:2024cv11125
Plaintiff:
Charles Miles
Defendant:
Wayne County Treasurer and Detroit Treasurer Office
Kelly Key v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
KELLY ROYCE KEY
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER
Robert Davis v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ALISHA BELL, Chairperson/Chairwomen of the Wayne County Board of Commissioners, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Owner of Gaukler Pointe Communications, LLC and others
Keith Durr v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1253
Plaintiff:
KEITH LARON DURR
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, WARREN C. EVANS, Wayne County Executive and KYM L. WORTHY, Wayne County Prosecutor
London v. River Rouge PD et al
as 2:2024cv10754
Plaintiff:
Randall Tremayne London
Defendant:
River Rouge PD, Barton Morris Law Firm and Wayne, County of
Michael Fleming v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELON FLEMING
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, BENNY N. NAPOLEON, MICHAEL KNAUS, 1st Shift Sgt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
