Cases 1 - 10 of 13
English v. Idea 247, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23081
Plaintiff:
Wayne English
Defendant:
Idea 247, Inc. d/b/a Idea Financial and Idea 247, Inc. doing business as IDEA FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ENGLISH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WAYNE ENGLISH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Engwall et al v. Tinsley et al
as 8:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dean Trew, Neal Engwall, Christie Sikora and others
Defendant:
Bobby Tinsley, Brian Quimby, Skuxchange, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Talley v. English et al
as 5:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Talley
Defendant:
Jerry Wayne English, Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc, Alliant Specialty Insurance Services Inc doing business as Tribal First and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
English v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
John Wayne English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
English v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2020cv03717
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEC, et al v. Albert Kaleta
as 18-20579
Appellant:
WAYNE ENGLISH and JAMES D. COLLING
Appellee:
THOMAS L. TAYLOR, soley in his capacity as Court-appointed Receiver for Kaleta Capital Management, Incorporated, et al.
Wayne English, et al v. Lowell Cage
as 18-20014
Appellant:
WAYNE ENGLISH and JAMES D. COLLING
Appellee:
LOWELL T. CAGE, Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01815
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00731
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
