Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stewart v. Mueller et al
as 1:2023cv05668
Plaintiff:
Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
Susan Mueller and Chung Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. New York State Department of C
as 22-964
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Hugh Knight, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Shannon Dickinson, on behalf of themselves and all otehrs similarly situated
Plaintiff:
Wayne Stewart, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, a public entity, Carl Koenigsmann, MD, Susan Mueller, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Chung Lee, MD and Albert Acrish, NP
Stewart v. Collado
as 1:2021cv05197
Respondent:
Jaifa Collado
Petitioner:
Wayne Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv08173
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jackson, Wayne Stewart, Peter Allen and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Mantaro, MD, John Doe #2, MD, Jon Miller, MD and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight et al v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2018cv07172
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("NYSDOCCS"), Dr. Susan Mueller, Dr. David Dinello and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dickinson, Wayne Stewart and Hugh Knight
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dr. Paula Bozer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. N.Y.C. Police Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv07652
Plaintiff:
Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
R. Henriquez, T. Fischer and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04335
Plaintiff:
Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
